Latest Tutorials

Learn about the latest technologies from fellow newline community members!

  • React
  • Angular
  • Vue
  • Svelte
  • NextJS
  • Redux
  • Apollo
  • Storybook
  • D3
  • Testing Library
  • JavaScript
  • TypeScript
  • Node.js
  • Deno
  • Rust
  • Python
  • GraphQL
  • React
  • Angular
  • Vue
  • Svelte
  • NextJS
  • Redux
  • Apollo
  • Storybook
  • D3
  • Testing Library
  • JavaScript
  • TypeScript
  • Node.js
  • Deno
  • Rust
  • Python
  • GraphQL
    NEW

    How Types of Agent in AI Drive Better Retrieval Augmentation

    Different AI agent types drive distinct advantages in retrieval augmentation (RAG) systems, offering tailored solutions for knowledge integration, scalability, and real-time adaptability. Understanding their roles helps developers choose the right tools for specific use cases. Below is a structured overview of key agent types, their implementation challenges, and real-world applications. Agentic RAG systems integrate AI agents into traditional RAG pipelines to enhance reasoning and context-awareness. For example, Agentic RAG (IBM , Weaviate ) introduces agents that dynamically refine queries, prioritize sources, and manage multi-step reasoning. This differs from standard RAG by enabling agents to "reflect" on their own responses, improving accuracy over time. See the section for more details on how these agent types differ. Another variant, Retrieval-Augmented Embodied Agents (source ), applies RAG principles to robotics, allowing machines to access contextual memory for tasks like object navigation. TURA (Tool-Augmented Unified Retrieval Agent) (source ) takes this further by bridging static RAG systems with dynamic data sources, such as APIs or live databases. This makes it ideal for applications needing real-time updates, like customer support chatbots. Meanwhile, SAP Joule agents (source ) focus on enterprise workflows, using RAG to automate document-heavy processes like compliance checks. Each agent type balances trade-offs between complexity, flexibility, and implementation cost.
    Thumbnail Image of Tutorial How Types of Agent in AI Drive Better Retrieval Augmentation
      NEW

      Review of Grok from XAI

      Watch: Ultimate GROK 4 Guide 2025: How to Use GROK For Beginners by AI Master Grok, developed by xAI, is an AI assistant designed to prioritize truthfulness and utility. It offers real-time information retrieval, coding assistance, and conversational capabilities. According to the App Store description , Grok integrates with X and provides answers to complex questions. User reviews highlight its speed and accuracy in tasks like code generation, such as xAI’s Grok Code Fast model, which developers can access for free through VS Code. For those seeking structured learning, Newline’s AI Bootcamp offers hands-on courses covering AI tools like Grok, building on concepts from the section. Grok competes with models like ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek in several areas. Here’s a quick comparison:
      Thumbnail Image of Tutorial Review of Grok from XAI

      I got a job offer, thanks in a big part to your teaching. They sent a test as part of the interview process, and this was a huge help to implement my own Node server.

      This has been a really good investment!

      Advance your career with newline Pro.

      Only $40 per month for unlimited access to over 60+ books, guides and courses!

      Learn More
        NEW

        How to Apply llms Fine Tuning in Your Projects

        Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) requires balancing technical expertise, resource allocation, and project goals. Below is a structured overview of techniques, timeframes, and real-world outcomes to guide your implementation. Different fine-tuning methods suit varying project needs. A comparison of popular approaches reveals trade-offs in complexity and effectiveness: For example, the D-LiFT method improved decompiled function accuracy by 55.3% compared to baseline models, showcasing the value of specialized fine-tuning strategies. See the Fine-Tuning with Hugging Face and Configuring Training Parameters section for more details on implementing these techniques.
        Thumbnail Image of Tutorial How to Apply llms Fine Tuning in Your Projects
          NEW

          Reactive vs Deliberative Agents: Which Fits Your Project?

          Watch: AI Agents: The Critical Difference Between Reactive Speed vs. Deliberative Intelligence by SystemDR - Scalable System Design A reactive agent operates by responding directly to environmental stimuli without maintaining an internal state, making it ideal for fast, rule-based tasks like chatbots or simple automation. In contrast, a deliberative agent uses internal reasoning, planning, and memory to handle complex, multi-step problems such as strategic game AI or autonomous navigation source . See the section for more details on their design and use cases, and the section for an in-depth exploration of their strategic capabilities. Below is a structured comparison to clarify their differences and use cases. Reactive agents are easier to build due to their stateless design, relying on predefined condition-action rules. For example, a chatbot responding to FAQs might require only a few hours of coding with tools like Rasa or Dialogflow. However, their simplicity limits adaptability—reactive agents struggle with tasks requiring memory or long-term planning source .
          Thumbnail Image of Tutorial Reactive vs Deliberative Agents: Which Fits Your Project?
            NEW

            How to Build a Computer Agent in AI

            Watch: n8n Tutorial for Beginners - Build Your First Free AI Agent by Kevin Stratvert Building a computer agent in AI involves selecting the right tools, mastering key techniques, and balancing time investment with complexity. Below is a structured overview of critical components, supported by real-world examples and tools. A comparison of popular AI frameworks reveals distinct advantages for different use cases:
            Thumbnail Image of Tutorial How to Build a Computer Agent in AI